巧办法
发表于 2025-3-23 10:52:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319273/319273_11.png
Agronomy
发表于 2025-3-23 15:16:03
Private Epistemic Virtue, Public Vices: Moral Responsibility in the Policy Sciencescter of scientific communities can be evaluated morally and be found wanting in terms of moral responsibility. Even an epistemically successful scientific community can be morally responsible for consequences that were unforeseen by it and its members and that follow from policy advice given by its
Encumber
发表于 2025-3-23 21:22:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319273/319273_13.png
挡泥板
发表于 2025-3-24 00:46:17
Amber Esping,Jonathan A. Plucker the study of the expert status and its role in policy-making processes. The claim is sustained by reviewing some well-known theses in ideational and related approaches in Comparative Political Economy.
去掉
发表于 2025-3-24 05:47:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319273/319273_15.png
微不足道
发表于 2025-3-24 08:36:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319273/319273_16.png
我悲伤
发表于 2025-3-24 11:22:46
Book 2014ance on the subjective judgment of experts and practitioners is the main source of useful knowledge to address and possibly, bring solutions to social problems. A common phenomenon in applications of science is that objective evidence does not point to a single answer or solution, to a problem. Reli
玩忽职守
发表于 2025-3-24 16:30:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319273/319273_18.png
背景
发表于 2025-3-24 22:00:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3193/319273/319273_19.png
Trigger-Point
发表于 2025-3-25 00:03:24
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-3238-9d and explained. A proposal for performing cross validation, based largely on the work of Eggstaff et al. (Reliab Eng Syst Saf 121:72–82, 2014) is formulated and illustrated with data from recent expert judgment studies.