foresight
发表于 2025-3-21 17:59:18
书目名称Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/if/?ISSN=BK0318563<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ifr/?ISSN=BK0318563<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/at/?ISSN=BK0318563<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/atr/?ISSN=BK0318563<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tc/?ISSN=BK0318563<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tcr/?ISSN=BK0318563<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ii/?ISSN=BK0318563<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/iir/?ISSN=BK0318563<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5y/?ISSN=BK0318563<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Existential Inertia and Classical Theistic Proofs读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5yr/?ISSN=BK0318563<br><br> <br><br>
COKE
发表于 2025-3-22 00:18:50
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3186/318563/318563_2.png
Fierce
发表于 2025-3-22 00:39:01
K. Schauenstein,R. Pfeilschifter,G. Wick, the chapter is relevant not only to the Aristotelian proof but also to the gap problem for persistence arguments more generally, as we also articulate a naturalist-friendly account of the nature of a necessarily existent, timeless foundation of reality. The account is based on recent work in the philosophy of physics on wavefunction monism.
PANT
发表于 2025-3-22 05:21:20
Function, Phylogeny, and Fossilsgue that the Neo-Platonic proof fails to deliver the mindedness of the absolutely simple being and actually militates against its mindedness. Finally, we uncover tensions between Christian doctrines and the Neo-Platonic proof.
Angioplasty
发表于 2025-3-22 11:51:36
Stage One of the Aristotelian Proof,everal defeaters afflict premise (7) of Feser’s argument. Next, we propose a new necessary condition for per se chains, arguing that our proposal provides an undercutting defeater for the argument. Finally, we argue that Feser’s inference from . actualizer to . actualizer is a non-sequitur on multiple fronts.
爱哭
发表于 2025-3-22 14:37:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3186/318563/318563_6.png
爱哭
发表于 2025-3-22 17:52:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3186/318563/318563_7.png
懒鬼才会衰弱
发表于 2025-3-23 01:07:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3186/318563/318563_8.png
legacy
发表于 2025-3-23 03:04:58
Book 2023defends new arguments against classical theism. The authors engage the following classical theistic proofs: Aquinas’s First Way, Aquinas’s .De Ente. argument, and Feser’s Aristotelian, Neo-Platonic, Augustinian, Thomistic, and Rationalist proofs. The authors also provide the first systematic treatm
Aviary
发表于 2025-3-23 08:36:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3186/318563/318563_10.png