FELON 发表于 2025-3-23 12:59:13
Context and Reflexivity: The Genealogy of Selfrked passion; yet searches designed to ferret it out just as often end by entrapping themselves in their own belief and passion. It were wiser perhaps to leave these matters to those more accustomed to the regions of illusion and sly dexterity: the magical crafts.Amnesty 发表于 2025-3-23 16:36:47
Comments on “Context and Reflexivity”d). Zaner clearly intends to speak to the issue of this Symposium in pointing out, in the text we just quoted, the role philosophy should play in the biomedical sciences. He is well aware that philosophy does not enter into this role out of a position of strength.清唱剧 发表于 2025-3-23 19:23:12
Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical SciencesProceedings of the F慢慢流出 发表于 2025-3-23 23:38:15
Evaluation and Explanation in the Biomedical Sciences978-94-010-1769-5tariff 发表于 2025-3-24 05:06:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317280/317280_15.pngRelinquish 发表于 2025-3-24 09:39:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317280/317280_16.pngKIN 发表于 2025-3-24 13:06:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02071-3d further, I will argue, unlike many other theses that are wholly unwarranted, it is pernicious, having as its consequence the view that philosophers ought not attempt to do what I claim it is both possible and crucial for them to do. The essence of my response will be quite simple: I grant that phiTAP 发表于 2025-3-24 16:58:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317280/317280_18.pngCulpable 发表于 2025-3-24 19:26:40
Introductiony there have been books published on the logic and philosophy of medicine.. But the formalization of issues and concepts in medicine has not received, at least in this century, sustained interest by professional philosophers. Groups of philosophers have not engaged medicine in order to explicate its遣返回国 发表于 2025-3-25 02:46:35
Comments on “Concepts of Function and Mechanism in Medicine and Medical Science” and “Organs, Organiere like .. Here Bernard’s — and Toulmin’s — analysis would stop. Wartofsky, however, would go one step further and say that socio-historical communities of organisms are like .: diseases which for Bernard and Toulmin then are pathologies of “words;” and “sentences” are for Wartofsky principally pat