新石器时代 发表于 2025-3-21 16:04:55

书目名称Evaluating Philosophies影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/if/?ISSN=BK0317237<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Evaluating Philosophies影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ifr/?ISSN=BK0317237<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Evaluating Philosophies网络公开度<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/at/?ISSN=BK0317237<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Evaluating Philosophies网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/atr/?ISSN=BK0317237<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Evaluating Philosophies被引频次<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tc/?ISSN=BK0317237<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Evaluating Philosophies被引频次学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/tcr/?ISSN=BK0317237<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Evaluating Philosophies年度引用<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/ii/?ISSN=BK0317237<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Evaluating Philosophies年度引用学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/iir/?ISSN=BK0317237<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Evaluating Philosophies读者反馈<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5y/?ISSN=BK0317237<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Evaluating Philosophies读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://impactfactor.cn/2024/5yr/?ISSN=BK0317237<br><br>        <br><br>

miniature 发表于 2025-3-21 21:47:43

0068-0346 avoids the use of obscure technical terms.Argues for an emer  The first part deals with philosophies that have had a significant input, positive or negative, on the search for truth; it suggests that scientific and technological are either stimulated or smothered by a philosophical matrix; and it ou

Spirometry 发表于 2025-3-22 02:53:49

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317237/317237_3.png

产生 发表于 2025-3-22 04:55:24

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317237/317237_4.png

MEET 发表于 2025-3-22 12:41:33

Matter and Energy: Physical or Metaphysical Concepts?.

偏狂症 发表于 2025-3-22 15:43:08

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317237/317237_6.png

偏狂症 发表于 2025-3-22 18:38:55

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4408-0Dialectics; Materialism; Realism; Scientism; Systemism; dealism

朦胧 发表于 2025-3-22 22:48:39

Mario BungeProposes and illustrates a simple criterion for evaluating any philosophical doctrine: Does it help advance knowledge?.Clearly written, and avoids the use of obscure technical terms.Argues for an emer

pulmonary 发表于 2025-3-23 01:34:08

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317237/317237_9.png

恶心 发表于 2025-3-23 08:58:03

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3173/317237/317237_10.png
页: [1] 2 3 4
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Evaluating Philosophies; Mario Bunge Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012 Dialectics.Materialism.Realism.Scientism.Sys