温和女孩 发表于 2025-3-23 10:38:30

,Altruism in the Charnel Ground: Śāntideva and Parfit on Anātman, Reductionism and Benevolence, that claims normative implications do not follow from Parfit’s reductionism. This objection, I argue, also applies to Śāntideva. Although her argument is probably effective against Parfit, in the final section I explain how Buddhist claims about impermanence and suffering provide a response to Wolf

Cantankerous 发表于 2025-3-23 17:09:48

,Variations on Anātman: Buddhist Themes in Deep Ecology and in Future-Directed Environmental Ethics,environmental ethics are versions of deep ecology. We sketch a style of environmental ethics that seems to follow from the consequentialist approach of two major contemporary Buddhist philosophers, Mark Siderits and Charles Goodman; we call this approach ‘future-directed’ ecology, to contrast it wit

铁砧 发表于 2025-3-23 21:01:23

Construction of invariant measures,th an overview of the various perspectives presented by the other contributors to this volume, and some common threads running through different segments of the volume; for example, some perspectives favour reductionist accounts of selfhood, while some favour non-reductionist accounts, and this diff

antidepressant 发表于 2025-3-23 23:15:43

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316100/316100_14.png

危险 发表于 2025-3-24 03:26:34

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316100/316100_15.png

小争吵 发表于 2025-3-24 07:43:13

objections to my claim that Sextus and Nāgārjuna represent a distinct category of religiosity, I end with reflections on what the study of Sextus and Nāgārjuna could add to contemporary philosophy of religion.

Banister 发表于 2025-3-24 11:15:37

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316100/316100_17.png

conference 发表于 2025-3-24 17:59:26

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14399-1ates one from suffering, for Kant the aim is an agency free of the conceit that interferes with clear moral vision, sound judgement, and dutiful action.  I conclude by responding to objections advanced by Charles Goodman which aim to show that the Kantian position is deeply at odds with Buddhist thi

ornithology 发表于 2025-3-24 21:34:06

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316100/316100_19.png

使闭塞 发表于 2025-3-24 23:35:24

Beginning the Search for Answers,of the self as a single entity but nonetheless affirms the value of assertive will to power, an ideal that is the opposite of Buddhist selflessness. An exploration of these themes through a comparative focus on Heidegger and . helps to identify various senses in which the self could be said to “be”
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Ethics without Self, Dharma without Atman; Western and Buddhist Gordon F. Davis Book 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Spr