僵局
发表于 2025-3-21 19:55:42
书目名称Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0316017<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0316017<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0316017<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0316017<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0316017<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0316017<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0316017<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0316017<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0316017<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Ethics and Philosophical Critique in William James读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0316017<br><br> <br><br>
CARE
发表于 2025-3-21 20:40:42
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316017/316017_2.png
新星
发表于 2025-3-22 02:35:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20189-2 be one. Yet pluralism should not be mistaken for intellectual laxity, as one’s selective take on reality or interested approach to an author can and should be defended with as many reasons and arguments as one is capable of, and then left to others to be challenged and eventually transformed in an
ODIUM
发表于 2025-3-22 07:47:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316017/316017_4.png
acclimate
发表于 2025-3-22 11:16:20
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41669-9losopher. In his most famous and celebrated ethical essay, “Moral Philosopher,” James employs the exhortative register to feature his therapeutic and transformational understanding of philosophical reflection. It is thus quite surprising that this register has gone virtually unnoticed by the literat
含铁
发表于 2025-3-22 16:52:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66971-6 This brings us to consider what kind of relationship runs between such writings. Most commentators depict this relationship in foundational terms: “Moral Philosopher” would contain James’s moral theory that he then applied, more or less successfully and consistently, to the resolutions of various e
含铁
发表于 2025-3-22 19:06:28
P. Neyret,D. Dejour,D. Ait Si Selmi of the views stated there for the discourse of the nature and stakes of moral reflection as approached in other texts. This has to do both with the inner complexity of James’s work on truth, and with an entrenched interpretation which has been mostly deaf to the ethical stakes of such texts. In P,
艰苦地移动
发表于 2025-3-22 23:30:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316017/316017_8.png
gustation
发表于 2025-3-23 04:39:57
Book 2015Marchetti offers a revisionist account of James‘s contribution to moral thought in the light of his pragmatic conception of philosophical activity. He sketches a composite picture of a Jamesian approach to ethics revolving around the key notion and practice of a therapeutic critique of one‘s ordinary moral convictions and style of moral reasoning.
虚度
发表于 2025-3-23 07:17:23
https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137541789Ethics; Metaphilosophy; Pragmatism; William James; ethics; moral philosophy; morality; philosophy; pragmatis