全能
发表于 2025-3-23 10:14:04
tivity. He sketches a composite picture of a Jamesian approach to ethics revolving around the key notion and practice of a therapeutic critique of one‘s ordinary moral convictions and style of moral reasoning.978-1-349-56002-8978-1-137-54178-9
exophthalmos
发表于 2025-3-23 14:24:44
Introduction: William James, the Moral Philosopher, be one. Yet pluralism should not be mistaken for intellectual laxity, as one’s selective take on reality or interested approach to an author can and should be defended with as many reasons and arguments as one is capable of, and then left to others to be challenged and eventually transformed in an
失败主义者
发表于 2025-3-23 21:06:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316017/316017_13.png
歹徒
发表于 2025-3-24 00:26:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316017/316017_14.png
lymphedema
发表于 2025-3-24 05:48:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316017/316017_15.png
chassis
发表于 2025-3-24 07:24:17
Truth, Experience, and the World Re-Enchanted, of the views stated there for the discourse of the nature and stakes of moral reflection as approached in other texts. This has to do both with the inner complexity of James’s work on truth, and with an entrenched interpretation which has been mostly deaf to the ethical stakes of such texts. In P,
FILLY
发表于 2025-3-24 11:32:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316017/316017_17.png
inculpate
发表于 2025-3-24 17:22:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-20189-2tters of concern here, this means that in arguing for a certain philosophical view or interpretation one is expressing a commitment which is as strong and valid as the readiness to defend and argue for them, while claiming that the fact that no real evaluation is possible means . subscribing to yet
平躺
发表于 2025-3-24 22:00:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316017/316017_19.png
健谈
发表于 2025-3-25 02:27:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3161/316017/316017_20.png