VEER
发表于 2025-3-21 20:08:54
书目名称Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley影响因子(影响力)<br> http://impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0315368<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0315368<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley网络公开度<br> http://impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0315368<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley网络公开度学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0315368<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley被引频次<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0315368<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley被引频次学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0315368<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley年度引用<br> http://impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0315368<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley年度引用学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0315368<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley读者反馈<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0315368<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley读者反馈学科排名<br> http://impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0315368<br><br> <br><br>
Affluence
发表于 2025-3-21 23:15:55
Something-I-Know-Not-What: Berkeley on Locke on Substanceof substance into question. His characterization of substance as a “something-I-know-not-what” that we merely suppose to underly the manifest qualities of things led Berkeley, it is claimed, to take the next step, deny that the notion of matter has any meaning at all, and in that way eliminate mater
愤世嫉俗者
发表于 2025-3-22 03:01:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315368/315368_3.png
咒语
发表于 2025-3-22 07:40:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315368/315368_4.png
权宜之计
发表于 2025-3-22 11:27:13
Berkeley’s Imaginationhat it is sufficient to establish his immaterialism. He is, he says, “content to put the whole” upon the issue of whether his reader can “conceive it possible for one extended moveable substance, or in general, for any one idea or any thing like an idea, to exist otherwise than in a mind perceiving
忘恩负义的人
发表于 2025-3-22 16:58:47
Berkeley on “Archetype”” in current use in philosophy, this other title would probably be considered just as acceptable, and long since justified by commentaries on immaterialism. However, Berkeley made a point of showing that some men with a name for learning merely fooled themselves with fine words and scholastic jargon
忘恩负义的人
发表于 2025-3-22 18:54:05
Divine Ideas and Berkeley’S Proofs of God’s Existencehas argued that Berkeley hardly cared whether God maintains the continuity of the tree in the quad by perceiving it when we do not. In particular, the famous argument which purports to deduce God’s existence from the continuous existence of sensible things is represented by Bennett as no more than a
止痛药
发表于 2025-3-22 21:53:27
Berkeley’s Divine Language Argumenttient with the . too much apologetics and too little philosophy. There is one apparent exception. The fourth dialogue, ‘The Truth of Theism,’ contains a proof of God’s existence. But on a closer look many have found an unexciting version of the design argument, a version easily slain by Hume. T. E.
Psa617
发表于 2025-3-23 04:03:24
Berkeley and Epistemologyo believe in such a thing. For Berkeley himself this was by no means the most important argument. In fact, it is not fully developed in the ., but only in sections 18-20 of the .. The reason for the secondary role accorded this argument by Berkeley is indicated by the opening sentence of section 18:
left-ventricle
发表于 2025-3-23 06:51:38
On the Status of Visuals in Berkeley’s he theses presented and the arguments marshalled in their support is, for these sections, no easy task. Sections 48 and 49 are especially hard to interpret. Since this part of . is very important for Berkeley’s presentation of his new philosophical account of vision, a special effort to make sense o