Optic-Disk 发表于 2025-3-25 04:48:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315368/315368_21.png悬崖 发表于 2025-3-25 08:39:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315368/315368_22.pngvasculitis 发表于 2025-3-25 15:29:13
Comparative Development Studiesment of insufficient evidence comes in only to back it up, for readers who may not have been convinced by the impossibility proof. Nonetheless, Berkeley’s epistemological argument is of great interest, both for its own sake and for what it can teach us about the relation between metaphysics and epistemology.scrape 发表于 2025-3-25 19:04:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315368/315368_24.png郊外 发表于 2025-3-25 23:13:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315368/315368_25.pngAids209 发表于 2025-3-26 03:28:40
Book 1987e was organized by the International Berkeley Society, with the support of several institutions and many people (whose help is acknowl edged below). This volume represents a selection of the lead papers deliv ered at that conference, most now revised. The Cartesian marriage of Mind and Body has prNICE 发表于 2025-3-26 04:38:52
Berkeley on “Archetype”. I shall argue: (I) that “archetypes,” contrary to what is often said, play no role in immaterialism; (II) that Berkeley used the term “archetype” only in response to his adversaries; and (III) that he uses this term, in any account of his own view, only when compelled to by objections made to his philosophy.Hypopnea 发表于 2025-3-26 09:30:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3154/315368/315368_28.png愤慨点吧 发表于 2025-3-26 14:37:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5638-4Berkeley’s . consist of sometimes isolated, sometimes incomplete sentences without any normal context. Often, one entry deals with one problem; the following with quite another; the next with a third, etc. As one entry sometimes contradicts another, one cannot possibly maintain without considerable qualification that:渗入 发表于 2025-3-26 18:47:20
A New Approach to Berkeley’s Berkeley’s . consist of sometimes isolated, sometimes incomplete sentences without any normal context. Often, one entry deals with one problem; the following with quite another; the next with a third, etc. As one entry sometimes contradicts another, one cannot possibly maintain without considerable qualification that: