亲密
发表于 2025-3-23 12:14:03
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70817-7Argumentation Ancient Philosophy; Ancient Rhetoric; Ancient Logic; Dialectic Ancient Philosophy; Rhetori
Magnificent
发表于 2025-3-23 17:38:55
Joseph Andrew Bjelde,David Merry,Christopher RoserCovers a broad range of ancient perspectives on argumentation.Combines approaches from argumentation theory and history of philosophy.Is an excellent resource on how ancient thinkers argue and think a
自传
发表于 2025-3-23 18:05:35
Argumentation Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/315297.jpg
展览
发表于 2025-3-24 00:13:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315297/315297_14.png
uveitis
发表于 2025-3-24 05:15:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315297/315297_15.png
NOMAD
发表于 2025-3-24 08:24:58
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49532-3 instructing us—I turn to the historical Gorgias. The ‘Encomium of Helen’ ascribes to . (speech) virtually all-powerful capacities for persuasion, seduction, and even bewitchment. Here Gorgias (seemingly) celebrates the very things Plato rejects. Yet in the ‘Defense of Palamedes’ considerable anxiet
连系
发表于 2025-3-24 11:28:16
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65640-9bouts is then given and their meaning explained. The transition from oral to written arguments is briefly examined, leading to the formulation of a delimitation problem in Plato’s dialogues, as he inserted dialectical arguments within ordinary dialogue contexts, turning them into discussions where o
Notorious
发表于 2025-3-24 17:14:30
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780312299613e clear: the dialectical use of arguments is epistemically valuable, while the rhetorical use is epistemically deficient. What is less clear, however, is how Plato justifies this sharp contrast. In this paper, I consider seven different ways scholarship has tried to answer this question. I argue tha
Spirometry
发表于 2025-3-24 21:55:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315297/315297_19.png
妨碍
发表于 2025-3-25 02:59:06
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70246-5at the success of the Socratic inquiry depends on the character of his interlocutors and their sense of what is shameful or not. To read the . is to inquire whether Socrates’ refutations have demonstrated anything. Although there is no definition of justice, happiness or the art of rhetoric, the dia