AFFIX
发表于 2025-4-1 03:07:53
Book 1976mediate Perception w. W. BAR TLEY, III/On Imre Lakatos 37 WILLIAM BERKSON / Lakatos One and Lakatos Two: An Appreciation 39 I. B. COHEN / William Whewell and the Concept of Scientific Revolution 55 L. JONATHAN COHEN / How Can One Testimony Corroborate Another? 65 R. S. COHEN / Constraints on Science
指耕作
发表于 2025-4-1 09:16:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315279/315279_62.png
Frequency-Range
发表于 2025-4-1 10:52:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315279/315279_63.png
仔细阅读
发表于 2025-4-1 14:41:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315279/315279_64.png
ALE
发表于 2025-4-1 20:06:53
Lakatos One and Lakatos Two: An Appreciation,art of my job should be to give a portrait of Lakatos’ personal manner. This would be informative from the point of view of history of thought, as it would help people read his works with greater understanding. And it would be interesting, if I succeeded at all: everyone who knew Lakatos would agree
交响乐
发表于 2025-4-1 23:44:47
William Whewell and the Concept of Scientific Revolution,sons for the attention given to scientific revolutions has been the challenging thesis of Thomas S. Kuhn, in his widely-read book, ... The critical response to Kuhn’s book. has largely been of three kinds: criticising his fundamental thesis or some aspect of it,. challenging the propriety of using t
Hot-Flash
发表于 2025-4-2 03:16:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315279/315279_67.png
Peristalsis
发表于 2025-4-2 10:25:48
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315279/315279_68.png
刺激
发表于 2025-4-2 11:20:14
Introduction: Culture, Cultural System and Science,.e., of Western culture from the vantage point of science. There are many intellectual histories from different points of view: the most easily acceptable are those of political and social ideas and institutions -some emphasize the central importance of religion, others the deep social role of the a
导师
发表于 2025-4-2 17:07:40
On the Critique of Scientific Reason,of relation between research programmes and the evidence. Let me call these types type . and type . respectively. They examine episodes where one research programme . replaces another research programme, . (or fails to be replaced by it), i.e. . is made the basis of research, argument, metaphysical