精致
发表于 2025-3-27 22:04:35
Immediate Perception,ffer here is something on a very much smaller scale. Nevertheless, any philosophy of science must not merely make use of, but must investigate, the notion of observation and so the notion of perception. In what follows I try to sort out what is living and what is dead in the notion of . perception.
Assault
发表于 2025-3-28 02:09:20
Ancient Geometrical Analysis and Modern Logic,as. One reason for this difficulty of understanding the method is the scarcity of ancient descriptions of the procedure of analysis. Another is the relative failure of these descriptions to do justice to the practice of analysis among ancient mathematicians.
宠爱
发表于 2025-3-28 06:22:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315279/315279_39.png
Pcos971
发表于 2025-3-28 11:04:35
0068-0346 tudents. This volume reflects the range of his interests in mathematics, logic, politics and especially in the history and methodology of the sciences. Indeed, Lakatos was a man in search of rationality in all of its forms. He thought he had found it in the historical development of scientific knowl
NADIR
发表于 2025-3-28 18:10:23
Transnational Power, Coercion, and Democracye. Not surprisingly, then, he was acidly critical of some aspects of the accepted modes of mathematical teaching (to be discussed below). Nonetheless, I know of no discussion of his educational philosophy — printed, manuscript, or orally presented.
不可接触
发表于 2025-3-28 20:48:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315279/315279_42.png
等级的上升
发表于 2025-3-29 01:49:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315279/315279_43.png
平躺
发表于 2025-3-29 05:26:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315279/315279_44.png
Indict
发表于 2025-3-29 09:04:07
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70588-0hics is possible.. Professor Lakatos’ criterion of rationality is based on his criterion of demarcation between science and pseudoscience. Hence, I shall begin my argument by exposing the latter criterion.
Gobble
发表于 2025-3-29 13:43:47
Coffee PlantersWorkers And Wivesh Popperian falsificationist dogmatism. Yet the lesson of ‘Proofs and Refutations’ is surely anti-Popperian. What it demonstrates, among other things, is how tenaciously, and even acrobatically, one can hold onto a thesis when the evidence runs against it.