任命 发表于 2025-3-25 04:28:31
DeterminersN NP ⇒ Det N; involving the notions of .entence, .oun .hrase, .erb .rase, .roper .ame, .terminer and .ommon .oun. In what follows, we shall focus on the Noun Phrases in this scheme. Some of their parts seem to be ‘interpretatively free’, in the sense of allowing any available denotation in a model.难听的声音 发表于 2025-3-25 10:19:08
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315275/315275_22.png恃强凌弱 发表于 2025-3-25 14:39:46
All Categories be brought to bear upon arbitrary grammatical types: adjectives, connectives, adverbs, etc. To broaden our scope, we will work against the background of an extensional ., with basic types . (‘entity’) and . (‘truth value’) — as in Section 1.1. — allowing formation of functional types (., .) (‘from分离 发表于 2025-3-25 19:43:21
Conditionalswitness to this tendency — postponing the well-known puzzles of intensionality. Nevertheless, our investigation is not at all restricted to the extensional realm — and we shall study some central intensional notions in the next two chapters. The first topic is that of ., perhaps the principal concer圆木可阻碍 发表于 2025-3-25 23:08:06
Tense And Modalityuantifiers. But the more traditional intensional constructions are rather . on propositions, such as modality or tense. Still, given the generalization made in Chapter 3 to arbitrary extensional categories, a similar move is possible for intensional notions. Instead of pursuing this topic in its fulVOC 发表于 2025-3-26 02:23:47
Natural Logiclogical artefacts. Thus, the ideal division of labour would come about, with the logician borrowing the linguist’s grammatical analysis in his account of inference, without having to set up his own shop for producing ‘logical forms’. Some strands in this book tend in such a direction — and we shallExhilarate 发表于 2025-3-26 07:43:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315275/315275_27.pngCoronary 发表于 2025-3-26 11:15:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315275/315275_28.png中世纪 发表于 2025-3-26 16:26:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3153/315275/315275_29.pnglaxative 发表于 2025-3-26 17:34:31
The Logic of Semanticsing which invites reflection. For, much clarity is still to be achieved as to the nature of semantic theory, explanation or evidence. One way to proceed here is by general philosophizing, much as in earlier periods. But a more concrete approach is also available at the present stage. There is room f