Intercept
发表于 2025-3-28 18:12:30
On Nagel’s Truth-Frequency Theory of Probabilityhow, according to Nagel, the issue of the meaning of probability should be addressed; (2) Nagel’s criticism of the major interpretations of probability advanced in the literature, and (3) the main traits of his “truth-frequency” theory.
听写
发表于 2025-3-28 22:43:52
Differential Operators on Smooth Manifolds,sulted in Carl Hempel’s earliest work on scientific explanation. Although scientific explanation was not a central topic for philosophers of science in the 1940s or 1950s, Hempel and Nagel’s interest in the topic helped to canonize it in a period when the topics and methods in philosophy of science became increasingly standardized.
stroke
发表于 2025-3-29 02:04:08
Book 2022rgotten by the history of philosophy of science community in recent years, this volume introduces Nagel’s philosophy to a new generation of readers and highlights the merits and originality of his works..Best known in the history of philosophy as a major American representative of logical empiricism
较早
发表于 2025-3-29 03:24:04
Nonlinear Differential Equationsrspective on science, a perspective which also determines a particular scope of the account of idealization. By these lights, particular types of questions simply do not arise, for instance: questions pertaining to the alleged peculiarity of scientific representation, the truth of law statements, etc.
incision
发表于 2025-3-29 10:44:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3148/314792/314792_45.png
忍耐
发表于 2025-3-29 13:24:19
Problems About the Set of Attainability,f the world and treats all entities as embedded in a wider network of entities. Part of the argument traces out how Nagel’s views on responsible speech and professionalism reflect a distinct understanding of the political role of philosophers of science.
Deduct
发表于 2025-3-29 15:56:00
Nagel on Idealization in Sciencerspective on science, a perspective which also determines a particular scope of the account of idealization. By these lights, particular types of questions simply do not arise, for instance: questions pertaining to the alleged peculiarity of scientific representation, the truth of law statements, etc.