maintenance
发表于 2025-3-25 07:02:13
Limiting Theories on Elastic Elliptic Shells Paul F. Lazarsfeld at Columbia University proved to be instructive in this regard. Moreover, Nagel stood in close contact with representatives of sociological functionalism and published, in 1956, a contribution on the prospects of a formalization of functionalism. In his seminal . from 1961, Nagel
jaundiced
发表于 2025-3-25 10:10:49
Problems About the Set of Attainability, (ii) to defend what he calls ‘contextual naturalism.’ And the chapter shows that (i-ii) reinforce each other and undermine alternative political and philosophical programs. The chapter’s argument responds to an influential argument by George Reisch that Nagel’s professional stance represents a kind
reflection
发表于 2025-3-25 11:39:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3148/314792/314792_23.png
Hypomania
发表于 2025-3-25 16:07:20
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3148/314792/314792_24.png
invade
发表于 2025-3-25 22:36:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3148/314792/314792_25.png
文件夹
发表于 2025-3-26 02:07:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3148/314792/314792_26.png
STELL
发表于 2025-3-26 06:31:53
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81010-8History of Logical Empiricism; American Pragmatism; Naturalism in the Philosophy of Science; Unity of S
Glower
发表于 2025-3-26 10:07:38
Introduction: Ernest Nagel and the Making of Philosophy of Science a Profession,(Sect. .). Regarding Nagel‘s philosophy, we focus on his role and activities to stabilize analytic philosophy (of science) and make it a profession, his views about the role and nature of history and sociology of science, naturalism, and socially engaged philosophy, and finally his understanding of
shrill
发表于 2025-3-26 14:17:02
Nagel’s Philosophical Development the American philosophical community but also remained faithful to the naturalism of his teachers. This paper aims to shed new light on Nagel’s intermediating endeavors by reconstructing his philosophical development in the late 1920s and 1930s. This is a decisive period in Nagel’s career because i
GENUS
发表于 2025-3-26 20:18:29
The Emergence of Scientific Explanation as a Problem for Philosophy of Science: Aristotle, Nagel, an increasing interest in the study of Aristotle. As I show, Nagel’s focus on the explanatory aim of science originated from his reading of Aristotle’s .. Through his teaching of Aristotle, Nagel inspired his New York colleagues to focus on a philosophical analysis of explanation. I claim that this re