谄媚于性
发表于 2025-3-25 07:06:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_21.png
带来
发表于 2025-3-25 10:43:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_22.png
富饶
发表于 2025-3-25 12:19:25
Discussions Defining the Least Advantagedst advantaged class, and have been mildly surprised to see no discussion in the literature about the import of that change. I offer this brief note primarily to publicise the change in Rawls’ views and to invite others to consider the significance of the new definition.
VICT
发表于 2025-3-25 16:49:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_24.png
subordinate
发表于 2025-3-25 23:30:27
The Claims of Reflective Equilibriumdoubts concerning the significance and value of this method. I will first briefly describe the process of reasoning dubbed by Rawls Reflective Equilibrium. I will then examine some of the claims made for it by Rawls, Nielsen, and others.
Obsequious
发表于 2025-3-26 03:37:28
Stability and Utopia; A Critique of Nozick’s Framework Argumentdid a terrible injustice to Darwin’s theory of evolution. Now, however, there seems to be a theory to which it can be accurately applied. I refer to Nozick’s theory of the minimal state as a framework for Utopia.
没收
发表于 2025-3-26 07:52:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_27.png
愚笨
发表于 2025-3-26 08:53:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_28.png
Lipohypertrophy
发表于 2025-3-26 14:43:42
Miscellaneous antibacterial agents,of this collection of papers helps to show how influential their respective theories of justice are. But their theories are also conflicting, in several important respects. Rawls is widely known as a proponent of what some refer to as the ‘welfare state’, while Nozick provides a theoretical foundati
减少
发表于 2025-3-26 17:02:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_30.png