Lice692
发表于 2025-3-23 11:15:47
Does Ambiguity Lurk Behind the Veil of Ignorance in Rawls’ Original Position?uces a hypothetical contract between parties it is no contract at all.. Margarita Levin argues that Rawls’ derivation of his principles of justice from the original position is unsound because it neglects a vital category distinction between one’s not having a characteristic and one’s not knowing ab
Root494
发表于 2025-3-23 17:52:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_12.png
指数
发表于 2025-3-23 20:23:19
Capitalism, Socialism, and Justice: Reflections on Rawls’ Theory of Justice liberty and an equality of self-respect, it is argued that only in a socialist society could such ideals be reasonably approximated. Rawls’ own assumptions of what constitute realistic social expectations are in conflict with his own principles of justice. If society must be as Rawls pictures it, t
conception
发表于 2025-3-23 23:07:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_14.png
表示向前
发表于 2025-3-24 04:35:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_15.png
abracadabra
发表于 2025-3-24 07:01:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_16.png
Condyle
发表于 2025-3-24 12:22:01
978-0-333-53845-6Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1991
收藏品
发表于 2025-3-24 18:15:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18594-1st advantaged class, and have been mildly surprised to see no discussion in the literature about the import of that change. I offer this brief note primarily to publicise the change in Rawls’ views and to invite others to consider the significance of the new definition.
繁重
发表于 2025-3-24 21:31:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_19.png
cacophony
发表于 2025-3-25 01:25:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3135/313425/313425_20.png