retort 发表于 2025-3-21 18:07:15

书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology影响因子(影响力)<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0313350<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0313350<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology网络公开度<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0313350<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology网络公开度学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0313350<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology被引频次<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0313350<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology被引频次学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0313350<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology年度引用<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0313350<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology年度引用学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0313350<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology读者反馈<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0313350<br><br>        <br><br>书目名称Epistemology versus Ontology读者反馈学科排名<br>        http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0313350<br><br>        <br><br>

激励 发表于 2025-3-21 21:02:09

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313350/313350_2.png

cylinder 发表于 2025-3-22 00:56:15

,Diphtherie, lobuläre Pneumonie, Scharlach,geometry and, in general, Hilbert’s axiomatic method, but also relativity theory and the so-called method of ideal elements. By drawing upon certain analogies rather than theory-constructions, these ideas affected not only his thinking about mathematics, but also his thinking about language and the nature of philosophy in general.

倔强不能 发表于 2025-3-22 05:34:19

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313350/313350_4.png

RENAL 发表于 2025-3-22 09:16:58

Wittgenstein’s Diagonal Argument: A Variation on Cantor and Turingr immediately after mentioning Turing, Wittgenstein frames what he calls a “variant” of Cantor’s diagonal proof. We present and assess Wittgenstein’s variant, contending that it forms a distinctive form of proof, and an elaboration rather than a rejection of Turing or Cantor.

BIAS 发表于 2025-3-22 13:58:28

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313350/313350_6.png

BIAS 发表于 2025-3-22 18:14:35

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313350/313350_7.png

负担 发表于 2025-3-22 23:15:06

Ahmed Ghazi,R. Devotini,Domenico Venezianoer logic has categorical characterizations of relevant mathematical structures, while set theory has non-standard models, amounts to no difference at all. Second order logic and set theory permit quite similar categoricity results on one hand, and similar non-standard models on the other hand.

magnate 发表于 2025-3-23 01:28:23

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313350/313350_9.png

曲解 发表于 2025-3-23 08:58:24

http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313350/313350_10.png
页: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Epistemology versus Ontology; Essays on the Philos P. Dybjer,Sten Lindström,G. Sundholm Book 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht