Boycott
发表于 2025-3-26 22:37:49
Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005
骑师
发表于 2025-3-27 01:39:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313308/313308_32.png
竖琴
发表于 2025-3-27 05:19:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313308/313308_33.png
separate
发表于 2025-3-27 10:38:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313308/313308_34.png
改革运动
发表于 2025-3-27 14:36:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71242-6the debate there are those epistemologists (internalists) who require the justifying factors of a belief to be cognitively accessible to the agent. Accordingly, something can be regarded as a justifier, that is, confer justification on a belief only if it is reflectively accessible to the subject. E
雄伟
发表于 2025-3-27 19:23:47
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230513907he idea behind the problem is that any attempt at attaining epistemically justified beliefs incurs the charge of circularity or vicious regress. To be more precise, what the problem of the criterion highlights is the difficulty arising from trying to determine the extent of knowledge (justified beli
Genome
发表于 2025-3-28 01:34:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313308/313308_37.png
芦笋
发表于 2025-3-28 05:44:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313308/313308_38.png
暗指
发表于 2025-3-28 08:10:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3134/313308/313308_39.png
Locale
发表于 2025-3-28 12:54:44
https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511422ing dogmatically to one’s beliefs is epistemically preposterous, it would be equally unreasonable, it is said, to change them in the absence of any good reasons. This position known as epistemic conservatism seems to have had a distinguished line of advocates among the likes of Quine and Chisholm. A