oxidant 发表于 2025-3-26 23:31:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_31.pnggroggy 发表于 2025-3-27 04:29:30
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_32.png猛击 发表于 2025-3-27 07:18:57
A Reply to Graves-Brownto reduce carbon dioxide emissions and loss of biodiversity. I can only emphasise what Paul has said. When the next round of road developments is announced, as it surely will be, archaeologists must play their part in awaking the public and decisionmakers to exactly what is being lost and in stressing the value of the loss.Neolithic 发表于 2025-3-27 09:36:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_34.png口味 发表于 2025-3-27 15:38:09
Is Human Osteoarchaeology Environmental Archaeology?ot be those that, at face value, are commonly perceived. Indeed, the opposite may be the case: characteristics resembling distinctions may, at a deeper level, operate as unifying forces. Factors deemed to unite the fields might, in fact, generate difference.Cacophonous 发表于 2025-3-27 18:49:40
A Reply to Thomasation, and I see “high level” theory operating somewhat independently from the low and middle level research strategies which guide data analysis. I agree with Thomas that debates about terminology are of minor importance, but definition of terms was not the intention of my paper, so I will clarify a couple of points.STIT 发表于 2025-3-28 00:29:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_37.png思想灵活 发表于 2025-3-28 03:01:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_38.png官僚统治 发表于 2025-3-28 10:17:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_39.pngarboretum 发表于 2025-3-28 10:33:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_40.png