标准 发表于 2025-3-23 13:44:19
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-99191-2 is an important issue of the project design and not just my personal whim? Everyone involved with the nitty-gritty of archaeology knows that the much talked about integration of the different archaeological sub-disciplines is still an unfulfilled dream. The way we approach archaeology has still asconstitutional 发表于 2025-3-23 17:09:35
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_12.pngAirtight 发表于 2025-3-23 21:33:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_13.png安心地散步 发表于 2025-3-24 00:49:25
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-03533-2An alternative view is that environmental archaeology should be considered as the analysis of “natural” materials from archaeological sites, and that the subdiscipline is characterised by the importance of taphonomy and middle range theory, and not by any particular high level theoretical stance. Th愚笨 发表于 2025-3-24 03:38:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_15.png魔鬼在游行 发表于 2025-3-24 09:39:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_16.png发出眩目光芒 发表于 2025-3-24 12:14:28
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-99844-6een criticised for their undue focus on the development of methodology, and an all-too-rare interest in cultural and social issues. Nowhere has this attack been more virulent than amongst post-processualists in the 1990s. However, this paper will seek to suggest that the failure of recent perspectiv带来的感觉 发表于 2025-3-24 16:46:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_18.pngexplicit 发表于 2025-3-24 22:30:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_19.pngLAY 发表于 2025-3-25 00:30:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/32/3126/312516/312516_20.png