audiologist
发表于 2025-3-23 12:45:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3078/307749/307749_11.png
jumble
发表于 2025-3-23 15:13:42
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26992-0at uses . and David Greig’s . (2010), that could be described as a prequel to .. What all these plays have in common is how they use Shakespearean material to make comparisons between the politics of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and events in the twentieth and twenty first centuries.
abstemious
发表于 2025-3-23 21:05:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14006-9 to appropriate Shakespeare’s ., due to what they perceive as its anti-Semitism, particularly after the Holocaust, if anything makes the play even more problematic when it comes to performing it. The chapter looks at the various ways each of these contemporary dramatists have ‘answered back’ to the
Traumatic-Grief
发表于 2025-3-23 22:48:44
F. Klein,M. Brendel,L. Schlesinger sources (most notably the festive comedies . and .), but how it stands as an example of a contemporary dramatist not so much directly challenging Shakespeare, as was the practice in the 1970s and 1980s, but as with Sarah Kane’s ., incorporating Shakespearean sources in a way that is not directly vi
buoyant
发表于 2025-3-24 02:27:23
Introduction: Appropriating the Past, of adaptation and how it differs from appropriation as a textual practice through the work of theorists including Roland Barthes, Michel Foucault, Julia Kristeva, Jean Genette, Harold Bloom, Linda Hutcheon, and Julie Sanders. The chapter also considers the applicability of other terms to describe t
NAIVE
发表于 2025-3-24 08:50:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3078/307749/307749_16.png
mutineer
发表于 2025-3-24 13:00:09
,A Host of Lears: Howard Barker’s ,, Elaine Feinstein’s ,, and Sarah Kane’s ,,atists have approached this work. One thing that all of the reinterpretations have in common is how they reconfigure family structures in the play. Elaine Feinstein and the Women’s Theatre Group’s . (1989) is a feminist appropriation that considers the consequences of fatherly neglect in . as well a
史前
发表于 2025-3-24 15:09:52
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3078/307749/307749_18.png
外观
发表于 2025-3-24 21:20:57
,‘If Power Change Purpose’: Appropriation and the Shakespearian Despot,at uses . and David Greig’s . (2010), that could be described as a prequel to .. What all these plays have in common is how they use Shakespearean material to make comparisons between the politics of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries and events in the twentieth and twenty first centuries.
陪审团
发表于 2025-3-25 02:29:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3078/307749/307749_20.png