无瑕疵
发表于 2025-3-25 05:54:52
Chapter 5 The Attack on Alterity a fully fledged parallel to Troeltsch’s typology. Bauman exposes Troeltsch’s ecclesiasticism as a chimera. His accounts of the anthropoemic and the anthropophagic neutralizations of alterity mirror Troeltsch’s sectarianism and Troeltsch’s mysticism respectively. However, Schmiedel argues that Bauma
agnostic
发表于 2025-3-25 09:23:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3056/305560/305560_22.png
生锈
发表于 2025-3-25 15:14:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3056/305560/305560_23.png
感染
发表于 2025-3-25 18:20:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3056/305560/305560_24.png
Guaff豪情痛饮
发表于 2025-3-25 22:20:48
Chapter 9 The Elasticization of Ecclesiologyitical philosophy of performativity, Ulrich Schmiedel offers a re-reading of Troeltsch’s ‘What Does “Essence of Christianity” Mean?,’ arguing that Troeltsch turns the conceptualization of the identity of Christianity from a ‘propositional possession’ into a ‘performative project.’ Here, Troeltsch co
stress-test
发表于 2025-3-26 01:34:36
2634-6591 lysis of Ernst Troeltsch’s interdisciplinary thinking in conThis study confronts the current crisis of churches. In critical and creative conversation with the German theologian Ernst Troeltsch (1865-1923), Ulrich Schmiedel argues that churches need to be “elasticized” in order to engage the “other.
chuckle
发表于 2025-3-26 05:15:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3056/305560/305560_27.png
Kidnap
发表于 2025-3-26 08:54:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3056/305560/305560_28.png
FLAX
发表于 2025-3-26 13:23:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28687-3røn and Claudia Welz, Schmiedel suggests that a togetherness of trust requires neither trust without suspicion nor suspicion without trust, but suspicion within trust. The truth of trust manifests itself in a hermeneutical search for truth which includes critical and self-critical moves. The truth of trust manifests itself in practice.
脆弱吧
发表于 2025-3-26 20:42:03
Book 2017ich Schmiedel argues that churches need to be “elasticized” in order to engage the “other.” Examining contested concepts of religiosity, community, and identity, Schmiedel explores how the closure of church against the sociological “other” corresponds to the closure of church against the theological