慎重
发表于 2025-3-26 22:48:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302953/302953_31.png
繁重
发表于 2025-3-27 03:24:20
Migrating to SharePoint Server 2016, our analysis was that the private monopoly supply of a public good is inefficient because, as in the case of a private good, the monopolist makes his supply artificially scarce. In this paper we study the question whether the inefficiency would disappear if there was a sufficient amount of competit
micronized
发表于 2025-3-27 05:48:32
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302953/302953_33.png
absorbed
发表于 2025-3-27 10:53:27
http://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/302953.jpg
Gudgeon
发表于 2025-3-27 15:06:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302953/302953_35.png
BRAWL
发表于 2025-3-27 18:11:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302953/302953_36.png
兽群
发表于 2025-3-27 22:38:53
Sayed Y. Hashimi,Sayed Ibrahim HashimiCharles Rowley and Wayne Brough offered a paper on a subject which is quite unknown on the continent, i.e. the Common Law and the American Court Rules. It is certainly unknown to me. Therefore I have to restrict my comments to some general remarks on the economic analysis in this paper.
Adjourn
发表于 2025-3-28 03:37:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302953/302953_38.png
不舒服
发表于 2025-3-28 06:36:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302953/302953_39.png
亚当心理阴影
发表于 2025-3-28 13:18:14
,Comment on C. Rowley and W. Brough: “The Efficiency of the Common Law: A New Institutional EconomicCharles Rowley and Wayne Brough offered a paper on a subject which is quite unknown on the continent, i.e. the Common Law and the American Court Rules. It is certainly unknown to me. Therefore I have to restrict my comments to some general remarks on the economic analysis in this paper.