发表于 2025-3-23 10:12:02

Ensembled-Correlations for Efficacy Analysis,he help of machine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis consisted of.simple linear regressions,.multiple linear regressions,.Bonferroni’s adjustments..Machine learning efficacy analysis consisted of ensembled-correlation methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more informative.

凹槽 发表于 2025-3-23 17:40:00

Gamma-Distributions for Efficacy Analysis,lp of machine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis consisted of.simple linear regressions,.multiple linear regressions,.Bonferroni’s adjustments..Machine learning efficacy analysis consisted of gamma-distribution methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more informative.

instill 发表于 2025-3-23 21:57:11

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-6134-1ses of variance, both paired and unpaired, are explained as methods for testing the significance of difference between a new and control treatment. Instead of treatment modalities as causal outcome factors, many more causal factors of health and sickness can be tested in clinical trials, like psycho

新奇 发表于 2025-3-23 22:59:55

Demanding Energy: An Introduction,ms on drug efficacy scores was tested, both traditionally and with the help of machine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis consisted of.Machine learning efficacy analysis consisted of optimal-scaling methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more info

冥界三河 发表于 2025-3-24 06:17:52

A Shared (Cost) Burden (Pillar Three), and with the help of machine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis was consisted of.Machine learning efficacy analysis consisted of ratio-statistic methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more informative.

大喘气 发表于 2025-3-24 08:16:03

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78809-6achine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis consisted of.Machine learning efficacy analysis consisted of complex-samples methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more informative.

爱哭 发表于 2025-3-24 13:34:48

http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302925/302925_17.png

delta-waves 发表于 2025-3-24 17:02:36

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6805-6d with the help of machine learning..Traditional efficacy analysis was composed of.Poisson statistics,.z-tests..Machine learning efficacy analysis was composed of evolutionary-operation methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and were more informative.

AGONY 发表于 2025-3-24 20:26:47

http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3030/302925/302925_19.png

噱头 发表于 2025-3-25 01:20:10

Daria Smirnova,Tatiana Smirnova,Paul Cummingnalysis was composed of.discretization of continuous predictors,.three dimensional bars of effects versus outcome,.crosstabs with chi-square statistics..Machine learning efficacy analysis was composed of high-risk-bin methods..The machine learning methods provided better sensitivity of testing, and
页: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Efficacy Analysis in Clinical Trials an Update; Efficacy Analysis in Ton J. Cleophas,Aeilko H. Zwinderman Textbook 2019 Springer Nature Swi