Monocle 发表于 2025-3-28 16:06:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301958/301958_41.pngIntact 发表于 2025-3-28 21:56:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301958/301958_42.pngdiscord 发表于 2025-3-29 00:27:18
Fostering the Autonomy of Legal Reasoning Through Legal Realismasoning to economic reasoning. After describing the pattern of interaction between both disciplines through the example of property rights (Sect. .) and linking it to the debate on reductionism in philosophy of science (Sect. .), the chapter proposes a strategy for salvaging the autonomy of legal reFeigned 发表于 2025-3-29 05:35:41
Reverse Engineering Legal Reasoningning”. Social engineering conceives of the law as a means to social ends and of the economist as the technician studying to what extent laws are fit for purpose. Building on this idea, reverse engineering legal reasoning is a way to identify economic concepts that describe—are coherent with or fit—t索赔 发表于 2025-3-29 08:19:15
2662-6535 be developed area of interaction between the disciplines..This book will be of interest to economists, legal scholars, and Law and Economics specialists, and can be used as teaching material in courses on Law & Economics and legal reasoning as well..978-3-030-40170-2978-3-030-40168-9Series ISSN 2662-6535 Series E-ISSN 2662-6543Ascendancy 发表于 2025-3-29 12:09:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301958/301958_46.png