Pastry
发表于 2025-3-26 23:51:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301958/301958_31.png
Aprope
发表于 2025-3-27 01:54:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301958/301958_32.png
Erythropoietin
发表于 2025-3-27 08:46:12
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301958/301958_33.png
排他
发表于 2025-3-27 10:55:05
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40168-9Legal reasoning; Legal institutions; Forensic economics; Legal interpretation; Alternative legal decisio
腐蚀
发表于 2025-3-27 17:37:28
978-3-030-40170-2The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerl
治愈
发表于 2025-3-27 21:05:10
Introduction,he topic of economics in legal, especially judicial, reasoning stems from the opposition of two argumentative styles in modern economics and in ordinary adjudication. Despite their differences, the commonalities between legal and economic reasoning constitute the stepping stone for investigating the
fledged
发表于 2025-3-28 00:41:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301958/301958_37.png
Abrupt
发表于 2025-3-28 04:06:44
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301958/301958_38.png
后来
发表于 2025-3-28 09:33:05
Economics in Judicial Decision-Making: Four Types of Situations Where Judges May Apply Economicsay or have to apply economic thinking. The chapter focuses on four model categories where judges intentionally or unintentionally use economic considerations and economic arguments, or where there is a place for an economic consideration to be employed: issue of procedural economy and efficient mana
Abrade
发表于 2025-3-28 12:51:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3020/301958/301958_40.png