现晕光
发表于 2025-3-23 10:22:33
Beccaria,rture, children hung for minor of-fences, compassion only for the rich and well-connected. Beccaria argues that a rational analysis should reject the eye-for-an-eye principle. Punishments should be set at the minimal level necessary to deter deviations from whatever social contract is in place.
SEVER
发表于 2025-3-23 15:46:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3009/300817/300817_12.png
Seminar
发表于 2025-3-23 19:31:37
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3009/300817/300817_13.png
blister
发表于 2025-3-24 01:21:56
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-99464-7er and further into hypocrisy to survive. How come he came to be regarded as a guru in his early years? What kind of society would allow such a threadbare prophet to be taken seriously? What is to be learned about the utopians of our own time, who similarly threaten our tranquility with their unworkable schemes?
自由职业者
发表于 2025-3-24 05:41:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3009/300817/300817_15.png
Glossy
发表于 2025-3-24 10:25:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3009/300817/300817_16.png
monogamy
发表于 2025-3-24 13:21:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3009/300817/300817_17.png
Foregery
发表于 2025-3-24 15:57:17
Shaftesbury,mmendations is never de_ned in the precise way that modern utilitarians think essential. A lec- ture that Plato gave at the Academy he founded in ancient Athens is perhaps the best exemplar of the ancient attitude. The lecture apparently caused consternation among the students for its claim that the
粗糙滥制
发表于 2025-3-24 19:36:27
Hutcheson,son as the first true utilitarian. He certainly anticipated Jeremy Bentham by writing of thegreatest happiness for the greatest number" as early as 1728, when the Scottish Enlightenment was just getting off the ground.
大厅
发表于 2025-3-25 01:01:07
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3009/300817/300817_20.png