invulnerable
发表于 2025-3-28 15:54:13
Defence Areas and Limits in the Investigations of the European Public Prosecutorhe provisions from which a guarantee statute can be extracted for those who will be subject to investigation and actions by the European Public Prosecutor’s Office. The Author concludes with an altogether positive assessment about the defence statute before the European Public Prosecutor’s Office bu
Predigest
发表于 2025-3-28 19:45:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3006/300548/300548_42.png
Compass
发表于 2025-3-29 01:07:33
Fair Trial Rights in the European Union: Reconciling Accused and Victims’ Rightsready guaranteed by the ECtHR? How do these rights compete or balance with the rights given the victims? This paper brings all these developments together and sketches the steps towards building up the rights-component of European criminal law.
Debark
发表于 2025-3-29 03:42:28
The Right of Access to a Lawyer in the European Union: Directive 2013/48/EU and Its Implementation iinimum standards on the rights, support and protection of the victims of crime, the EU adopted different measures on the minimum procedural rights of defendants. In this paper, the Author focusses her attention on Directive 2013/48/EU, 22 October 2013, on the right of access to a lawyer and its implementation into the Spanish legal system.
RECUR
发表于 2025-3-29 10:32:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3006/300548/300548_45.png
前奏曲
发表于 2025-3-29 14:03:31
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3006/300548/300548_46.png
职业拳击手
发表于 2025-3-29 17:39:36
on the other, no effective remedies have been introduced in criminal proceedings. The result is the Italian judiciary seems not to have recognised the reform’s importance by continuing the restrictive interpretation of the right to linguistic assistance.
使饥饿
发表于 2025-3-29 23:45:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3006/300548/300548_48.png
Assemble
发表于 2025-3-30 03:58:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3006/300548/300548_49.png
Crumple
发表于 2025-3-30 07:04:11
Die Transportschicht des Internets,urt. This paper, however, argues that judicial control of a Union institution should be exercised by a Union court and that the treaty system of judicial protection does not allow for a delegation of jurisdiction to national courts.