尖叫 发表于 2025-3-26 22:23:19
,The Ballagh Barracks ‘Rioters’,er, not a party member or even a supporter of one, as he resolutely rejected any intimacy with the party system. He never wrote with a certain ideology in mind. What I find central in his outlook on politics is the amalgamation of the public and personal where the two emerge as one. He is never emba要求比…更好 发表于 2025-3-27 01:08:01
Statt eines Nachworts: Selbstkritik,‘fragment’ (whether Forster intended it to be so is another question). Hassan is obviously Masood. After the editor gives the fragment an approximate date (1907?), she comments: ‘It offers surprisingly early evidence of Forster’s interest in Indian and English differences, but his friendship with Ma注射器 发表于 2025-3-27 07:53:59
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3003/300210/300210_33.png全面 发表于 2025-3-27 10:14:59
Introduction and Preliminaries,view of fiction; and I believe it is Forster’s concern to see some demarcation line between fact and fiction, no matter how illusory this may be. Commenting in Aspects ofthe Novel on the interrelationship between life and fiction, he makes it a point that the reality of one is not that of the other.Anticoagulant 发表于 2025-3-27 16:50:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3003/300210/300210_35.png合适 发表于 2025-3-27 20:04:09
Statt eines Nachworts: Selbstkritik,‘fragment’ (whether Forster intended it to be so is another question). Hassan is obviously Masood. After the editor gives the fragment an approximate date (1907?), she comments: ‘It offers surprisingly early evidence of Forster’s interest in Indian and English differences, but his friendship with Masood began late in 1906’ (AS, xxviii).Simulate 发表于 2025-3-28 00:27:09
8楼陶醉 发表于 2025-3-28 03:51:34
9楼不出名 发表于 2025-3-28 10:06:36
9楼我不死扛 发表于 2025-3-28 12:30:59
9楼