储备
发表于 2025-3-23 11:42:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3003/300210/300210_11.png
周兴旺
发表于 2025-3-23 17:09:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3003/300210/300210_12.png
B-cell
发表于 2025-3-23 19:44:26
Conclusion, movement ignored by Forster in . which, as we know, is focal in Said’s critique of Forster. What is particularly interesting is that Allen holds the same comparison Said makes between Edward Thompson and Forster to reach the same conclusion. This is what Allen says:
巡回
发表于 2025-3-24 01:38:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3003/300210/300210_14.png
相互影响
发表于 2025-3-24 02:43:00
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3003/300210/300210_15.png
人造
发表于 2025-3-24 06:55:47
Person and Persona in the Portrait of Imperialism,er, not a party member or even a supporter of one, as he resolutely rejected any intimacy with the party system. He never wrote with a certain ideology in mind. What I find central in his outlook on politics is the amalgamation of the public and personal where the two emerge as one. He is never emba
外星人
发表于 2025-3-24 12:07:01
,‘Hassan in England’: a Western Room with an Oriental View,‘fragment’ (whether Forster intended it to be so is another question). Hassan is obviously Masood. After the editor gives the fragment an approximate date (1907?), she comments: ‘It offers surprisingly early evidence of Forster’s interest in Indian and English differences, but his friendship with Ma
Mortar
发表于 2025-3-24 15:53:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3003/300210/300210_18.png
Kernel
发表于 2025-3-24 21:36:15
http://reply.papertrans.cn/31/3003/300210/300210_19.png
watertight,
发表于 2025-3-24 23:17:05
Conclusion,what Richard Allen says in a contribution to a publication which he edited for the Open University . (already quoted above). Allen repeats almost everything Said said in . seven years before his contribution. He points to a nineteenth-century realist novel style in which Forster wrote his novel. The