审问,审讯
发表于 2025-3-23 10:36:41
Poetic Resistance to Cold War Politics,ent scholarship scrutinizes both Greek and Mahāyāna forms of ocularcentrism, I argue that the hazards reside not in the prioritization of sight to the neglect of other senses, but in the latent positivism visual metaphor tends to, but need not, reinforce. I cast Dōgen as a “negative ocularcentrist”
adequate-intake
发表于 2025-3-23 16:29:49
Fazit: Klappe zu, Affe(kt) tot?, of reading Dōgen as a philosophical figure, arguing that Dōgen’s mystical and paradoxical language can generally be cut through, yielding straightforward assertions of determinate philosophical views. As a proof of concept, I offer philosophical readings of Dōgen on two issues. First, I argue that
nonradioactive
发表于 2025-3-23 21:20:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2849/284872/284872_13.png
刺耳的声音
发表于 2025-3-24 02:01:40
Carlos Martinho,Isabel Machado,Ana Paivam with other cases of usage in the entire work, their provenance in the tradition of Zen thought, as well as with their possible translational equivalents and their connotations in the Western tradition. A central claim for which I argue is that a presentist reading of the fascicle (as well as other
祸害隐伏
发表于 2025-3-24 05:35:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2849/284872/284872_15.png
难解
发表于 2025-3-24 07:17:14
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2849/284872/284872_16.png
停止偿付
发表于 2025-3-24 14:14:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2849/284872/284872_17.png
modest
发表于 2025-3-24 16:36:31
Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultureshttp://image.papertrans.cn/e/image/284872.jpg
spinal-stenosis
发表于 2025-3-24 21:34:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2849/284872/284872_19.png
伦理学
发表于 2025-3-25 01:17:04
Philosopher, Religious Thinker or Contemplative Practitioner? Making Sense of Dōgen Beyond Zen Moderilosopher Hans-Georg Gadamer (1900–2002). According to van der Braak, for Gadamer, understanding is possible through a merging of horizons, one’s own with that which one aims to understand. Regarding Dōgen, a central claim of Gadamer’s approach to understanding is that it is impossible to understand