Germinate
发表于 2025-3-23 09:59:13
Defining . Among Pyrrhonists, . is likely to have been studied by Aenesidemus, to have been commented on by Zeuxis, and to have worked as a source for Sextus Empiricus, which contributes to explaining the collocation of this text at the end of Sextus’ codices.
Largess
发表于 2025-3-23 15:07:48
Structural Commentarysion is that between the antilogic form of chs. 1–6 and the monologic of chs. 7–9. A second one concerns the antilogies of chs. 1–5 and that of ch. 6. Then, chs. 1–4—which, properly speaking, are the true δισσοὶ λόγοι—stand out for their common logic. Lastly, chs. 1–3 offer the best expression of sophistic moral relativism.
富足女人
发表于 2025-3-23 18:57:17
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284800/284800_13.png
耐寒
发表于 2025-3-24 01:37:39
Defining y of its author, its sources and its reception in antiquity. Contrary to the standard view of the work as the collection of lecture-notes made by a Doric-speaking sophist around 403–395 BCE, . appears to have been written between 355 and 338, in an Eastern form of Doric κοινή, by a sophist who aimed
干旱
发表于 2025-3-24 04:25:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284800/284800_15.png
GLEAN
发表于 2025-3-24 09:11:53
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284800/284800_16.png
不如屎壳郎
发表于 2025-3-24 14:36:05
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284800/284800_17.png
Folklore
发表于 2025-3-24 17:40:10
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284800/284800_18.png
faucet
发表于 2025-3-24 21:48:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284800/284800_19.png
Flirtatious
发表于 2025-3-25 01:54:21
This second commentary delves into each of the nine . chapters, providing a synopsis of it and examining its most salient lemmas from a textual, linguistic, literary, historical, rhetorical, and philosophical point of view.