CODA 发表于 2025-3-25 06:45:34
Jill Q. Klausner,David C. Chen MDI’ll introduce the topic through some informal arguments and then go on to a formal proof. An alternate take will appear in the section on Restricted Choice using Bayes Theorem. In the subsequent discussion I follow the reasoning and even some of the wording in the striking paper by Miller and Sanjurjo rather closely.figurine 发表于 2025-3-25 11:20:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284774/284774_22.pngInclement 发表于 2025-3-25 13:44:13
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284774/284774_23.png有杂色 发表于 2025-3-25 19:35:27
In the previous section we saw that a random sample of per-capita cancer rates by county can exhibit considerable variation depending on sample size.AXIS 发表于 2025-3-25 22:25:44
Tsukemono — die Kunst des EinlegensMedical screenings can be a source of well intentioned but seriously flawed judgements by doctors due to a cognitive failure in assessing conditional data. I provide a striking example here concerning a common procedure to screen for colon cancer in which, as will be seen, Bayes Theorem lurks in the background.hypertension 发表于 2025-3-26 03:33:15
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-1429-1The spooky quality of coincidences rarely fails to fascinate and confound people who experience them. What I hope to show is that many, perhaps most, coincidences are less amazing than they first appear to be.清澈 发表于 2025-3-26 06:18:03
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2848/284774/284774_27.png安定 发表于 2025-3-26 08:32:29
Christopher P. McKay,Rafael Navarro-GonzálezThis section and the one that follows are a bit more technical and makes use of continuous random variables unlike the rest of this book.PAC 发表于 2025-3-26 16:16:16
Success Runs in Bernoulli Trials,A streak of 76 consecutive heads occur in a coin tossing game. The loser remarks that . (from the play . ).采纳 发表于 2025-3-26 19:39:04
A Subtle Bias,I’ll introduce the topic through some informal arguments and then go on to a formal proof. An alternate take will appear in the section on Restricted Choice using Bayes Theorem. In the subsequent discussion I follow the reasoning and even some of the wording in the striking paper by Miller and Sanjurjo rather closely.