Taylor
发表于 2025-3-21 18:19:43
书目名称Durkheim & Critique影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0283438<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Durkheim & Critique影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0283438<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Durkheim & Critique网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0283438<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Durkheim & Critique网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0283438<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Durkheim & Critique被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0283438<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Durkheim & Critique被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0283438<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Durkheim & Critique年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0283438<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Durkheim & Critique年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0283438<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Durkheim & Critique读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0283438<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Durkheim & Critique读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0283438<br><br> <br><br>
条约
发表于 2025-3-21 21:55:01
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2835/283438/283438_2.png
CHART
发表于 2025-3-22 03:13:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2835/283438/283438_3.png
是剥皮
发表于 2025-3-22 08:36:59
Building the Bridges to Securitydt and Durkheim fundamentally diverge. The singularity of American constitution-making, according to Arendt, is what made the historical transmissibility of this revolutionary experience possible. Durkheim, for his part, argues that the French revolutionary tradition needs to be intellectually revis
TAG
发表于 2025-3-22 11:43:44
Diane Barrett Ph.D., C.I.S.S.P.proposing a new theory of ideology: as every ideology is an act of totalization, grounded in the idealization of the categories allowing this totalization itself, it seems that solidarity, understood as a scientific (sociologically) established principle of totalization, lacks its own idealization.
Flawless
发表于 2025-3-22 16:57:13
Mathieu Bagot,Pascale Launay,Frédéric Guidecempirical means to realize its political ambition: to transform modern society as a whole, thanks to those institutions that had to achieve modern solidarity by overthrowing capitalist exploitation through democratic participation.
Flawless
发表于 2025-3-22 20:10:21
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2835/283438/283438_7.png
NEEDY
发表于 2025-3-23 00:11:03
Nima TaheriNejad,David Pollreiszble to recognize the political ideal that we, as moderns, must want: that of a self-direction of society, that is, of an ever-increasing democratization of the state—a project that corresponds to Durkheim’s definition of socialism.
茁壮成长
发表于 2025-3-23 03:35:56
Introduction,luation of Durkheim’s epistemological, political, and critical ambitions which resituated his position in the history of modern philosophical and sociological thought was emerging. Following this intellectual conjuncture, the contributions contained in this book investigate Durkheim’s legacy in orde
CLAMP
发表于 2025-3-23 05:52:43
Hegel and Durkheim: Contours of an Elective Affinityill consider the question of whether we find in Hegel’s . a placeholder for what Durkheim refers to as a kind of cosmopolitan ethics, a standpoint beyond the role-obligations connected to membership in individual states (iii). In my conclusion I will raise the question of the relevance of Hegel’s an