不开心 发表于 2025-3-28 16:07:20

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2824/282358/282358_41.png

Certainty 发表于 2025-3-28 22:11:49

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2824/282358/282358_42.png

正常 发表于 2025-3-29 02:13:18

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2824/282358/282358_43.png

代理人 发表于 2025-3-29 05:55:31

Rethinking Moral Motivation: How Neuroscience Supports an Alternative to Motivation Internalism,s. I argue that such a conception of moral judgment is both descriptively and normatively adequate. Such considerations provide reasons to reject motivation internalism. However, rather than simply adopt externalism, I argue that the relation between moral judgment and motivation is governed by a no

厚脸皮 发表于 2025-3-29 08:27:10

The Reactive Roots of Retribution: Normative Implications of the Neuroscience of Punishment, and the considerations that support it. More precisely, these intuitions are not good evidence for normative theories of punishment. This argument may have implications for a range of non-consequentialist principles and intuitions that extend beyond the domain of punishment. This chapter extends th

intelligible 发表于 2025-3-29 14:12:27

http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2824/282358/282358_46.png

美食家 发表于 2025-3-29 17:13:36

Nervous Norms,oomed to moral and epistemic failure. This mistake has been well documented by KWM Fulford and this chapter attempts to apply this fundamental mistake of psychiatric ethics as a moral and methodological lesson for future neuroethics. This chapter closes with a plea for interdisciplinary teams to be
页: 1 2 3 4 [5]
查看完整版本: Titlebook: Does Neuroscience Have Normative Implications?; Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth Hildt Book 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020 neuroet