conjunctivitis 发表于 2025-3-25 03:37:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2824/282358/282358_21.png品尝你的人 发表于 2025-3-25 07:45:05
Empirische Transformationsforschungretributive and consequentialist. In general, retributivist considerations are backward-looking and thus justify punishment in terms of “just deserts.” By contrast, consequentialist considerations are forward-looking and thus justify punishment in terms of its good effects. This chapter contends thaTERRA 发表于 2025-3-25 12:06:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2824/282358/282358_23.png独轮车 发表于 2025-3-25 18:04:38
Means of Production in Agriculturea moral view in an evidence free manner seems both morally and epistemically vicious. But failing to muster an empirically informed moral view is only one way to err regarding the relationship between empirical facts and moral norms. We might also make the mistake of . on facts when engaging moral q碎石 发表于 2025-3-25 21:50:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2824/282358/282358_25.pngFOR 发表于 2025-3-26 03:06:48
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96674-4 neuroscience and ethics and specifies three possible ways (solving ethical issues in specific contexts, developing normative standards that can be used to regulate and evaluate the behaviors of a group of individuals with particular cognitive abilities or disabilities, and identifying and correctinConcrete 发表于 2025-3-26 05:27:11
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2824/282358/282358_27.png带来的感觉 发表于 2025-3-26 08:51:37
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56134-5neuroethics; normative implications; neuroscience; prosocial behavior; mind perception and morality; moraPamphlet 发表于 2025-3-26 16:06:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2824/282358/282358_29.pngFEAS 发表于 2025-3-26 20:33:51
Geoffrey S. Holtzman,Elisabeth HildtThe only collection dedicated exclusively to essays addressing the implications of neuroscience for philosophical ethics.Brings together the philosophical subdisciplines of ethics and philosophy of co