神秘
发表于 2025-3-23 13:12:22
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2040-9Common Sense; Nation; discourse and behavior; literary diction
缓解
发表于 2025-3-23 16:31:25
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280954/280954_12.png
LATE
发表于 2025-3-23 20:05:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280954/280954_13.png
inchoate
发表于 2025-3-24 01:08:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280954/280954_14.png
AXIOM
发表于 2025-3-24 04:59:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280954/280954_15.png
金桌活画面
发表于 2025-3-24 09:25:12
Everyday Explanation,n commonsense explanation depicts man as rational, and (2) that such a theory is that which social-science explanation of action ought also to suppose” (p. 43). The second assumption is fully discussed in the following chapters. As we have already seen, and as Pettit himself at least partly apprecia
CRUMB
发表于 2025-3-24 14:31:16
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280954/280954_17.png
Decibel
发表于 2025-3-24 17:03:32
Representations of Internal States,itions and daily practices, they are so close to truisms, that the tendency among sociologists of action has been to accept them uncritically. On the evidence of the preceding chapter, though, common sense and intuition are far from reliable indicators of internal states and processes. Our self-insi
敬礼
发表于 2025-3-24 19:49:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280954/280954_19.png
谦卑
发表于 2025-3-24 23:26:29
Good Reasons,on—the concept of norm—and the discursive alternative to the Parsonian theory of normative action. At the same time, we continue our investigation of commonsense explanation. Finally, in this and the next chapters, we add a few strokes to our image of an adequate sociology of action. We have seen th