FARCE 发表于 2025-3-21 18:40:01
书目名称Discourse and Behavior影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0280954<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Discourse and Behavior影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0280954<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Discourse and Behavior网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0280954<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Discourse and Behavior网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0280954<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Discourse and Behavior被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0280954<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Discourse and Behavior被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0280954<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Discourse and Behavior年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0280954<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Discourse and Behavior年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0280954<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Discourse and Behavior读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0280954<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Discourse and Behavior读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0280954<br><br> <br><br>indignant 发表于 2025-3-21 21:57:28
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280954/280954_2.png形状 发表于 2025-3-22 02:23:51
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280954/280954_3.pngGUISE 发表于 2025-3-22 06:18:38
Heat Viewed at Different Scalesn commonsense explanation depicts man as rational, and (2) that such a theory is that which social-science explanation of action ought also to suppose” (p. 43). The second assumption is fully discussed in the following chapters. As we have already seen, and as Pettit himself at least partly appreciaALIEN 发表于 2025-3-22 11:56:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1158-7 rational manner? In carrying out the decision study, I collected data in the form of villagers’ explanations of their own and others’ choices. I attended to the data as indications of a pattern of intentions and motives. This is not merely a social-scientific strategy, but the normal orientation ofBLAZE 发表于 2025-3-22 14:57:11
The standard SIR epidemic modelitions and daily practices, they are so close to truisms, that the tendency among sociologists of action has been to accept them uncritically. On the evidence of the preceding chapter, though, common sense and intuition are far from reliable indicators of internal states and processes. Our self-insiBLAZE 发表于 2025-3-22 17:52:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2810/280954/280954_7.png因无茶而冷淡 发表于 2025-3-22 23:27:50
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30900-8on—the concept of norm—and the discursive alternative to the Parsonian theory of normative action. At the same time, we continue our investigation of commonsense explanation. Finally, in this and the next chapters, we add a few strokes to our image of an adequate sociology of action. We have seen thExpediency 发表于 2025-3-23 01:25:47
Stochastic Epidemic Models with Inferencescriptions and accounts of social order are phrased in terms of rules. (Of course, such descriptions may also be phrased in terms of statistical tendencies, but this is not the approach of a discursive sociology of action.) Therefore, we must reach some understanding about the fundamental nature of飞行员 发表于 2025-3-23 07:31:10
Chapter 1 Stochastic Epidemic Modelsnations of behavior. I have raised what I take to be serious questions about the empirical foundations and the internal logic of the orthodox/commonsense theory. As a foundation for an alternative approach to social action, I proposed that we view internal states, such as intention, motivation, and