减震
发表于 2025-3-26 22:09:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280427/280427_31.png
有抱负者
发表于 2025-3-27 04:46:30
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91741-2of what Diṅnāga’s principal motivations were in writing his treatises on logic and epistemology. Scholars whose main familiarity with the Buddhist epistemologists was with the works of Dharmakīrti and Śāntarakṣita quite naturally concluded that the chief preoccupation of the Buddhist epistemologists
负担
发表于 2025-3-27 06:21:36
, II: “On reasoning”, consists in discerning an object through a sign that has three characteristics. As was the case above, this too refers to the resulting cognition. Their fields of operation and essential natures are dissimilar.
终止
发表于 2025-3-27 11:05:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280427/280427_34.png
Mawkish
发表于 2025-3-27 14:26:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280427/280427_35.png
Ondines-curse
发表于 2025-3-27 19:43:06
,Nominalism in Pre-Diṅnāgan Buddhism,sunderstood. In order to reduce that risk somewhat it may be advisable to compare how the terminology evolved in the tradition from which it is being borrowed and to point out differences between that tradition and the tradition to which the borrowed terminology is being applied. In the previous cha
GRUEL
发表于 2025-3-28 01:20:22
,Diṅnāga’s Theory of Knowledge,m, and that as a skeptic his main interest was not to find a way to increase our knowledge but rather to find a way to subtract from our opinions. To state the matter in a slightly different way, I shall argue that Diṅnāga’s central interest was to set down the necessary conditions that would have t
取消
发表于 2025-3-28 03:11:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/29/2805/280427/280427_38.png
Robust
发表于 2025-3-28 10:16:18
Translations,udy contains the first twenty-five verses . of the second chapter of the ., in which Diṅnāga sets down his own views on the limits of the inferential process. Chapter seven contains four selections from . chapter five. The first selection comprises . 5:1–13, in which Dinnāga discusses the nature of
一骂死割除
发表于 2025-3-28 11:04:07
, II: “On reasoning”, consists in discerning an object through a sign that has three characteristics. As was the case above, this too refers to the resulting cognition. Their fields of operation and essential natures are dissimilar.