Blandishment
发表于 2025-3-21 16:54:12
书目名称Dialogical Rhetoric影响因子(影响力)<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/if/?ISSN=BK0270874<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dialogical Rhetoric影响因子(影响力)学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ifr/?ISSN=BK0270874<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dialogical Rhetoric网络公开度<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/at/?ISSN=BK0270874<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dialogical Rhetoric网络公开度学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/atr/?ISSN=BK0270874<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dialogical Rhetoric被引频次<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tc/?ISSN=BK0270874<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dialogical Rhetoric被引频次学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/tcr/?ISSN=BK0270874<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dialogical Rhetoric年度引用<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/ii/?ISSN=BK0270874<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dialogical Rhetoric年度引用学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/iir/?ISSN=BK0270874<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dialogical Rhetoric读者反馈<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5y/?ISSN=BK0270874<br><br> <br><br>书目名称Dialogical Rhetoric读者反馈学科排名<br> http://figure.impactfactor.cn/5yr/?ISSN=BK0270874<br><br> <br><br>
刚开始
发表于 2025-3-21 21:55:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2709/270874/270874_2.png
Pelvic-Floor
发表于 2025-3-22 04:18:45
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0476-3Argument; dialectic; dialogue; logic; postmodernism; rhetoric
抛物线
发表于 2025-3-22 07:40:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2709/270874/270874_4.png
改良
发表于 2025-3-22 10:23:46
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2709/270874/270874_5.png
缓解
发表于 2025-3-22 13:11:47
Steven Burgess,Casey Rentmeesterthey had something to say about the concept of truth, said surprisingly little: they were far more interested in truths than in “truth”’ (Pitcher, 1964, 1). Pitcher suggests that the interest in theories of truth was triggered by the ‘apparently outrageous things which the Absolute Idealists of the
缓解
发表于 2025-3-22 18:26:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9442-8s yielding incompatible conclusions cannot be permitted. We have seen that pre-modern philosophy had no need to defend its (mono-)logic, but as soon as the modernist ’turn to the subject’ had its logical counterpart in the syntactical approach of Frege a problem emerged. Modern formal logic allowed
围裙
发表于 2025-3-23 00:00:22
Frank C. Richardson,Robert C. Bishopion is what accounts for such normative distinctions. As all of these distinctions are debatable (at least from a human perspective), we can see them as outcomes of discussions. We might therefore generalize the problem as a matter of evaluating arguments and concentrate on the distinction between g
FLING
发表于 2025-3-23 04:02:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/28/2709/270874/270874_9.png
enlist
发表于 2025-3-23 07:52:57
Patrick Londen,Philip Walsh,Jeff Yoshiminormativity differs from a dialectical approach, as well as from a mono-logical one. The latter holds that there is only one logic that controls the correctness of inferences. I argued that mono-logic requires a strong understanding of truth, and I hope to have explained sufficiently that we should