出处
发表于 2025-3-25 04:04:34
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268266/268266_21.png
高谈阔论
发表于 2025-3-25 09:24:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268266/268266_22.png
朋党派系
发表于 2025-3-25 14:00:26
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268266/268266_23.png
headlong
发表于 2025-3-25 17:45:39
Conclusion, soul. In fact, the deliberate aggravation of Regius’ conflicts with the theologians could be seen as one of Descartes’ principal aims in rushing into print with his response. Henri Gouhier commented on the .: “This is excommunication; from 1648 Cartesianism had its modernist heresy.”
Geyser
发表于 2025-3-25 20:05:29
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268266/268266_25.png
orthopedist
发表于 2025-3-26 00:28:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268266/268266_26.png
得罪人
发表于 2025-3-26 04:41:50
,Thorax (Herz — Lunge — große Gefäße),or optimism in the microcosm theory was achieved by emphasising human dignity in the proximity to those other neighbours on the ladder of being, the angels. Many seventeenth century apologists exploited this latter emphasis, teaching that, with the pure spirits, the human soul enjoys a natural immor
不能约
发表于 2025-3-26 10:51:28
,Thorax (Herz — Lunge — große Gefäße),rictly disciplined use of vocabulary.. In a recent article, Cottingham comments, in regard to Descartes’ use of mind and soul, that “he made no distinction between the two terms”.. While this is true of the 1647 French translation, such a comment could be misleading without reference to the . radica
dialect
发表于 2025-3-26 12:38:40
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00791-4 by Descartes, a “little study composed by our illustrious author”. This brief text was the . which Descartes had sent to Mersenne on 31 December 1640, and which was now available to Arnauld to assist him in the study of the . manuscript. He welcomed it as shedding “much light on the work as a whole
不出名
发表于 2025-3-26 19:36:27
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268266/268266_30.png