HALL
发表于 2025-3-23 12:18:57
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00791-4om the real distinction between the human soul (.) and body, as Descartes wanted to claim. He noted as a possible objection the case of brute animals whose souls (.) are, according to the “vulgar” philosophy, distinct from their bodies, but which neverthless, according to the demands of Christian do
外表读作
发表于 2025-3-23 15:38:53
Person, Places, and Developmentst to . in the .: “the human mind is not made up of any accidents in this way, but is a pure substance.”. Descartes’ meaning seems plain enough — unlike the human body the mind is not constituted by its changing “accidents”, by its “different objects of understanding and different desires and sensat
不能平静
发表于 2025-3-23 19:08:39
Fethullah Gülen’s Teaching and Practicerbonne”, had taken Descartes at his word when in the Letter of Dedication the author of the . had asked the Faculty of Theology to examine his work and to correct any mistakes it might contain, and to suggest ways in which it might be “supplemented, completed and clarified”.. Arnauld considered that
忍受
发表于 2025-3-23 23:06:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268266/268266_14.png
不遵守
发表于 2025-3-24 04:12:24
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268266/268266_15.png
Graduated
发表于 2025-3-24 10:08:47
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2683/268266/268266_16.png
惊惶
发表于 2025-3-24 13:32:46
Person, Places, and Developmentke the human body the mind is not constituted by its changing “accidents”, by its “different objects of understanding and different desires and sensations”. This notion of substance excludes individual bodies, but includes “body in general” as well as individual minds.
一美元
发表于 2025-3-24 15:22:20
,“The Human Mind is a Pure Substance”,ke the human body the mind is not constituted by its changing “accidents”, by its “different objects of understanding and different desires and sensations”. This notion of substance excludes individual bodies, but includes “body in general” as well as individual minds.
混合物
发表于 2025-3-24 20:37:00
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00791-4ndicate where the role of reason ends and that of faith enters. Both Mersenne and Descartes could find support for their divergent positions in the vast contemporary philosophical and apologetic literature on the nature of the human soul.
现代
发表于 2025-3-25 02:20:16
A Parallax History of Fetish Theory soul. In fact, the deliberate aggravation of Regius’ conflicts with the theologians could be seen as one of Descartes’ principal aims in rushing into print with his response. Henri Gouhier commented on the .: “This is excommunication; from 1648 Cartesianism had its modernist heresy.”