flex336
发表于 2025-3-28 16:00:42
Reflections on the Root Causes of Outrage Discourse on Social Mediaificant physical, social and economic displacement that has occurred in many post-industrialised countries in recent decades. While outrage discourse is a feature of political discussion on social media in many countries, this essay focuses in particular on developments in the USA and the UK.
确定无疑
发表于 2025-3-28 19:23:25
Identifying Political Participants on Social Media: Conflicts of Epistemic Justice disadvantages associated with more traditional media. It then sets out the epistemological difficulties of both content-regulation and the marketplace of ideas. It concludes with a defense of source transparency, tempered by the need to protect the identities of those who may be endangered by disclosure.
septicemia
发表于 2025-3-29 02:54:10
As Maine Goes, So Goes the Nation? Ranked Choice Voting and STV as Antidotes to Tribal Populism. The parallels raise comparable questions for potential application on the national stage. As Maine’s case illustrates, political, statutory, and constitutional hurdles to effective electoral reform movements can be quite serious, but perhaps not insurmountable.
entreat
发表于 2025-3-29 04:36:09
1873-877Xpopulism.Addresses the relationships between populism and dThis book tackles questions related to democracy, populism and truth, with results that are sure to inform pressing academic and popular debates. It is common to describe many of today’s most energizing politicians and political movements a
accordance
发表于 2025-3-29 07:54:53
Indikationen — Kontraindikationene democracies, and this causes serious trouble for two leading types of democratic theory, deliberative democracy and aggregative democracy. If my arguments are correct, we may be left without a normative democracy theory that satisfies basic moral requirements.
hair-bulb
发表于 2025-3-29 14:58:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265192/265192_46.png
conscribe
发表于 2025-3-29 18:09:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2652/265192/265192_47.png
发酵
发表于 2025-3-29 21:53:58
Democracy, Truth, and Understanding: An Epistemic Argument for Democracystemic arguments. The first is that we attend to other epistemic concepts—notably understanding—which are often left out of the equation. The second is that we also revisit and revise the concept of truth in which the epistemic argument is typically framed.
Conquest
发表于 2025-3-30 00:59:46
Book 2020s common to describe many of today’s most energizing politicians and political movements as populist. Some are progressive advocates of greater economic democracy or individual rights, while others are recognizably authoritarian and anti-democratic, even while claiming to defend democracy. What all
Lucubrate
发表于 2025-3-30 05:20:03
Democracy and Populisme democracies, and this causes serious trouble for two leading types of democratic theory, deliberative democracy and aggregative democracy. If my arguments are correct, we may be left without a normative democracy theory that satisfies basic moral requirements.