包裹
发表于 2025-3-28 17:16:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264707/264707_41.png
帽子
发表于 2025-3-28 21:27:01
Nitzan Cohen,Emma Sicher,Seçil Uğur Yavuz argue in this paper, however, that, at least for certain purposes, the techniques recently developed within the field of nonmonotonic logic may provide a better theoretical framework for the formal study of normative reasoning than the usual modal treatment.
断言
发表于 2025-3-28 23:10:56
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264707/264707_43.png
草本植物
发表于 2025-3-29 05:34:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264707/264707_44.png
Presbycusis
发表于 2025-3-29 08:14:38
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264707/264707_45.png
不持续就爆
发表于 2025-3-29 15:23:54
Introduction, notions from normative reasoning, including the notions of . obligation, contrary-to-duty obligations, and moral dilemmas have raised serious problems for deontic logicians, problems which have defied solution within standard deontic logic and its extensions. As a result, deontic logic has fallen i
interference
发表于 2025-3-29 16:39:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264707/264707_47.png
Junction
发表于 2025-3-29 23:05:54
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264707/264707_48.png
夜晚
发表于 2025-3-30 02:45:57
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2648/264707/264707_49.png
sclera
发表于 2025-3-30 05:27:35
The Many Faces of Defeasibility in Defeasible Deontic Logic,asoning about what normally is the case. In defeasible deontic logic these two are combined. An example of this combination is the sentence ‘normally, you should do .’. Now the problem is what to conclude about somebody who does not do .? Is this an exception to the normality claim, or is it a viola