concentrate
发表于 2025-3-23 09:45:19
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2643/264202/264202_11.png
dura-mater
发表于 2025-3-23 16:02:07
Optimization and Dynamical System of achievement of activities in fulfilling these needs. Each activity achievement level is a function of commodity and performance inputs, consumption performance styles, and environmental states resulting partly from stochastic processes. “Styles” are patterns by which commodities and labor are co
造反,叛乱
发表于 2025-3-23 18:07:46
Grid Integration of Renewable Energyornstein and Wallsten‘s (in press) subjects were asked to choose among gambles concerning the outcomes of future basketball events. When the subjects judged the chances of winning the gambles prior to indicating their preferences, they made decisions of poorer quality. Erev and Wallsten‘s (1990) sub
情节剧
发表于 2025-3-24 01:17:10
Christian Bauckhage,César Ojeda,Rafet Sifan more patterns of behavior than expected utility theory. It must be shown that such a theory explains a significant proportion of patterns that cannot be explained by the existing theory. Although many attempts to test alternative theories have been made, most analysis has focused upon particular a
大约冬季
发表于 2025-3-24 06:26:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2643/264202/264202_15.png
Heart-Rate
发表于 2025-3-24 09:44:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2643/264202/264202_16.png
翻动
发表于 2025-3-24 11:19:45
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2643/264202/264202_17.png
愉快吗
发表于 2025-3-24 17:20:31
Intertemporal Risk-Aversion and Calibration Uncertainty May Explain Violations of the Independence Alais mean/variance model, the Chew weighted nonlinear utility model and the Bell elation/disappointment model as special cases. Thus intertemporal risk-aversion and positive intertemporal correlation between lotteries can potentially explain violations of independence.
Silent-Ischemia
发表于 2025-3-24 20:49:54
Decision Versus Policy: An Expected Utility Resolution of the Ellsberg Paradoxn to distinguish between urns whose contents are more or less ambiguous. Specifically, risk averters will avoid ambiguity and risk seekers will prefer ambiguity. A resolution of Ellsberg’s paradox is thereby provided, in which ambiguity aversion/seeking is “rational”, but the normative status of expected utility remains unassailed.
cringe
发表于 2025-3-24 23:13:33
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2643/264202/264202_20.png