IRS
发表于 2025-3-30 12:08:36
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260434/260434_51.png
heckle
发表于 2025-3-30 14:44:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260434/260434_52.png
使痛苦
发表于 2025-3-30 20:08:58
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260434/260434_53.png
整理
发表于 2025-3-31 00:22:40
and , as Supra-Metaphysics I claim that when focusing on the various roles and relatedness of . and . rather than looking for their importance and asking which is prior, one realizes that Z. Xi cannot be regarded as a dualist. Moreover, I suggest that when the so-called “. metaphysics” is presented along this line, a “sense
Bombast
发表于 2025-3-31 01:54:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260434/260434_55.png
indignant
发表于 2025-3-31 07:41:41
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2605/260434/260434_56.png
慢慢流出
发表于 2025-3-31 13:16:15
Z, Xi and Later Neo-Confucianstivation and moral psychology (represented by Wang Yangming), (2) Ming–Qing Confucians’ criticisms of his “dualistic” metaphysics of . (represented by Wang Fuzhi), and (3) Dai Zhen and Qing Confucians’ criticisms of Zhu Xi’s ethics and of ideological misuses of Song–Ming Neo-Confucianism.