颂扬本人
发表于 2025-3-26 21:05:14
Thinking Mattergress’ must be tempered, Bergson insists, by a recognition that something in the very nature of intellect as an . (rather than, for example, divinely ordained) entity places a necessary limitation on it. From this evolved condition,
narcissism
发表于 2025-3-27 03:34:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2601/260027/260027_32.png
Explosive
发表于 2025-3-27 06:40:09
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2601/260027/260027_33.png
旁观者
发表于 2025-3-27 12:30:16
Book 2005uman‘ conceptions of a material kinship between humans, animals and machines can transform our understanding of Lawrence‘s work and of its complex relationship with scientific epistemologies. Through detailed readings of evolutionary philosophy, and of the ‘new Bergsonism‘ of Deleuze and others, Wal
MORPH
发表于 2025-3-27 16:03:43
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2601/260027/260027_35.png
大漩涡
发表于 2025-3-27 19:35:35
Adrija Bhattacharya,Sankhayan Choudhurythe mind that directs it’? The hand ‘flickers’ with a life of its own, and comes to learn and know things through touch. It slips along, jumps to dot an ., gets cold or bored — in fact, has its own ‘rudiments’ of thought. ‘Why should I imagine that there is a . which is more . than my hand is?’ (P 533)
致词
发表于 2025-3-27 22:54:04
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2601/260027/260027_37.png
嘲笑
发表于 2025-3-28 03:09:33
Book 2005ationship with scientific epistemologies. Through detailed readings of evolutionary philosophy, and of the ‘new Bergsonism‘ of Deleuze and others, Wallace provides a radical reappraisal of Lawrence in terms of an ‘antihumanist (or posthumanist) humanism‘ (Hardt and Negri).
褪色
发表于 2025-3-28 07:01:02
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2601/260027/260027_39.png
Irrigate
发表于 2025-3-28 14:12:06
http://reply.papertrans.cn/27/2601/260027/260027_40.png