防止
发表于 2025-3-23 10:29:11
,Die religiöse Grundlage im Schwesternberuf,within Anglo-American literary theory and criticism for approximately the last decade. This ‘turn’ has taken many different forms, ranging from texts by and about poststructuralist ethics, to work on present and past ethical philosophy, from a reusing of older forms of ethical and evaluative critici
ETCH
发表于 2025-3-23 16:22:14
,Die Beratung mit den Verkäufern,en framed in terms of the use and abuse, the powers, pleasures, limits and liabilities of the voice. Much of this work is governed by a powerfully assumed, and sometimes theoretically uninspected, negative injunction against the privation of the voice, whether through appropriation or silencing. In
针叶类的树
发表于 2025-3-23 19:19:18
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-27188-7anxiety; bibliography; Donald Davidson; Emmanuel Lévinas; English literature; fragment; hermeneutics; ident
Merited
发表于 2025-3-23 23:15:39
978-1-349-27190-0Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1999
壕沟
发表于 2025-3-24 03:55:55
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2400/239948/239948_15.png
哪有黄油
发表于 2025-3-24 08:04:49
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2400/239948/239948_16.png
DEFER
发表于 2025-3-24 11:33:46
Flaws: James, Nussbaum, Miller, LevinasHow are we to read ‘ethically’? How, if at all, do literary texts ‘show’ or ‘testify’ to ethics, to the ‘whole conduct of life’? In the fragmentary text of ., Maurice Blanchot describes three different ways of reading:
细胞学
发表于 2025-3-24 15:02:49
The Ethics of Biography and AutobiographyI shall be arguing that biographers and autobiographers incur different kinds of moral risk, just as they pursue different moral opportunities. To set some contexts, I shall risk an autobiographical account of my work in ethics and literature, begun in the late 1960s.
Little
发表于 2025-3-24 22:30:38
http://image.papertrans.cn/c/image/239948.jpg
救护车
发表于 2025-3-25 00:14:24
Imagining the Centre to the ‘numerous and well disciplined armies’ that properly secure the stability of a disputatious culture. Moreover, Kant’s fawning deference to his sovereign seems a relic of a pre-democratic era, a mark of what he himself characterized as ‘immaturity’, a political and intellectual position from