积习已深 发表于 2025-3-30 09:00:40
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2396/239511/239511_51.pngGRAVE 发表于 2025-3-30 13:10:18
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2396/239511/239511_52.pngTrabeculoplasty 发表于 2025-3-30 20:16:40
Peter Loos,August-Wilhelm Scheer the meaning of informed consent and the ethics observation, the politics of covert , politics of alignment and nonalignment, and the risks of genuine participation. On all of these issues, reasonable people disagree.Ccu106 发表于 2025-3-31 00:29:23
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2396/239511/239511_54.pngVeneer 发表于 2025-3-31 02:58:39
http://reply.papertrans.cn/24/2396/239511/239511_55.png未成熟 发表于 2025-3-31 06:11:50
ideas on improving the teaching of evaluation. At subsequent annual meetings, these informal sessions attracted more and more participants, eager to talk about common teaching interests and to exchange reading lists, syllabuses, assignments, and paper topics. The ses sions were irreverent, innovatCalculus 发表于 2025-3-31 11:09:14
Harald F. O. von Kortzfleisch,Udo Winande a one-page self-assessment of their constructions based on those criteria. The intent is to get the students started on developing their own unique construction of evaluation, and get them in a posture to continue seeking out improvements.Aspirin 发表于 2025-3-31 15:00:40
Ulrich Wanka,Rainer Unland,Stefan Kirnhey want answers and they need or request information to supply the answers. In applied settings like state government, managers must zero in on pertinent data that specifically answer their questions.烧瓶 发表于 2025-3-31 19:11:37
Harald F. O. von Kortzfleisch,Udo Winandmuch more likely it is to happen to novices! Hence a careful evaluability assessment before entering into a project can prevent many deadend efforts. Although experienced evaluators may do informal evaluability assessments based upon their prior efforts, students should be taught to follow a more formal procedure.superfluous 发表于 2025-3-31 23:18:24
Thomas Schwan,Axel Röpnack,Cornelius Angeract assessment), cost-effectiveness, management information systems, nominal group/delphi, quality assurance, literature review, personnel evaluation, expert review (a. k. a. illuminative evaluation), and systems evaluation.